92 research outputs found

    Megaliths, monuments and materiality

    Get PDF
    Stones, and especially the arrangement of large stones in relation to one another, have long been the focus of attention in megalith studies, a concern reflected in the name itself. It is, however, a blinkered view. Many so-called megalithic monuments embody other carefully selected materials in their construction, including turf, soil, rubble, and timber. In considering long barrows, Paul Ashbee noted that it was a false distinction to separate earthen long barrows from stone-chambered long barrows as the builders of long barrows inevitably used materials available within their local environments. Alternatively, writing mainly about the Irish material, Arthur ApSimon suggested a development from timber to stone implying an onological progression in the preferred use of materials. Whether environmental or evolutionary, it is certain that many monuments interchangeably combine stone and wood in their construction in a way that forces us to consider what these and other materials meant to the megalith builders. Was it simply about what was available? Or what was fashionable? Or were there deeper sets of meanings relating to how different materials were perceived and understood within the cosmological systems that lie behind the design, construction,and use of long barrows, passage graves, dolmens and other related monuments? Focusing upon wood and stone, it is argued here that both were components of a cyclical world view of life and death that was embedded in the fabric and structure of monuments

    Stonehenge excavations 2008

    Get PDF
    The following paper is the first published account of an excavation that took place at Stonehenge during April 2008. As this was the first excavation to take place within the stone circle for some forty years, the excavation has attracted an uncommon degree of interest, hence its publication in the Antiquaries Journal as an interim account of work in progress, in the form of an edited transcript of a paper first given at the Ordinary Meeting of the Society of Antiquaries of London on 9 October 2008. The paper explains that the 2008 excavation set out to date the construction of the Double Bluestone Circle at Stonehenge and to chart the subsequent history of the bluestones and their use at the monument. Evidence is presented for a provisional working date of around 2300 BC for the construction of the Double Bluestone Circle, while it is argued that the history of the site is far more complex than has been allowed for in existing interpretations, with a multiplicity of overlapping and intercutting (though not continuous) events, including substantial late Roman, medieval and early modern activity. The excavated material, and the evidence from the surviving stones, supports the suggestion that bluestones were brought to the site because of their perceived special qualities, perhaps for their supposed healing properties, and that some knowledge of those qualities remained current in later times with the result that in excess of two-thirds of the original bluestone volume has now disappeared

    WIGGOLD: The archaeology of a 'lofty open country'. Project Design: Phase 1 (2007)

    Get PDF
    WIGGOLD: The archaeology of a lofty open country is a research project jointly conceived and run by Bournemouth University School of Conservation Sciences,Cotswold Archaeology,and Abbey Home Farm (Cirencester) to promote a greater understanding of the ancient past and facilitate access to it for education and enjoyment

    Celebrating 25 Years

    Get PDF

    Excavations at a Neolithic Enclosure on The Peak, near Birdlip, Gloucestershire

    Get PDF
    Surveys and excavations in 1980–81 confirmed Peak Camp as a Neolithic enclosure on a flat promontory of the Cotswold escarpment overlooking the Severn Valley just 1km south of Crickley Hill. Although heavily eroded by quarrying the site can be reconstructed as having two concentric arcs of boundary earthworks forming an oval plan which was probably open to the north where a steep natural slope defined the edge of the site. A section through the outer boundary showed four main phases of ditch construction, at least one causewayed. An extensive series of radiocarbon dates shows construction began in the late 37th century cal BC and probably continued through successive remodellings into the 33rd century cal BC or beyond. An internal ditch or elongated pit situated in the area between the inner and outer boundary earthworks had a similar history. Where sampled, the ditch and internal feature was rich in material culture, including a substantial assemblage of plain bowl pottery; flint implements and working waste; animal remains dominated by cattle but including also the remains of a cat; human foot bones; slight traces of cereal production; a fragment of a Group VI axe; part of a sandstone disc; and a highly unusual shale arc pendant of continental type. It is suggested that the ditch fills represent selectively redeposited midden material from within the site that started to accumulate in the late fifth or early fourth millennium cal BC. The construction and use of Peak Camp is contemporary with activity on Crickley Hill, and the two sites probably formed components of a single complex. Its use was also contemporary with the deposition of burials at local long barrows in the Cotswold-Severn tradition which are linked by common ceramic traditions and the selective deposition of human body parts

    Roads to Stonehenge: A prehistoric healing centre and pilgrimage site in southern Britain

    Get PDF
    Pilgrimage to established ceremonial centres is widespread in many cultures past and present. Such centres share numerous common traits, some of which can be recognized through archaeological signatures. But it is only part of the picture. Something of the complexity of ceremonial sites and their usage is explored through two anthropological cases in which ancient sites still used in the modern world provide insights into how structured purposeful journeys might have worked in prehistoric times: the Hajj to Mecca (Saudi Arabia), and journeys to the cathedral of St James in Santiago de Compostela (Spain). Using the perspectives offered by these places, attention then turns to Stonehenge on the chalk downs of central southern England as an archaeological case. The great stone monuments of the third and second millennia BCE did not exist in isolation but were part of a much wider long-lived ceremonial landscape that lay at the intersection of numerous routes and roads that brought materials and people to this significant place. Two key themes relating to the roads to Stonehenge are explored. First, the origins and derivation of the stones used in the construction of Stonehenge: sarsens stones from the Wessex Downs, and so-called ‘Bluestones’ from southwest Wales. Second, is the way the site worked for the people who used it and where they came from. Wege nach Stonehenge: Ein vorgeschichtliches Heilzentrum und Pilgerstätte im südlichen Britannien Das Pilgern zu einschlägigen Kultzentren ist weitverbreitet in heutigen wie in vergangenen Zeiten. Diese Stätten verfügen alle über unzählige bekannte Straßen; einige davon sind durch archäologische Beweise ›sichtbar‹ geworden. Das ist aber nicht alles: Aspekte von Komplexität und Nutzung kultureller Zentren können im Vergleich durch zwei anthropologische Beispiele dargestellt werden, bei denen historische Stätten auch heute weiterhin genutzt und aufgesucht werden. Sie bieten uns Einblicke wie strukturiertes und zielgerichtetes Reisen in frühgeschichtlicher Zeit funktioniert haben könnten: der Haji nach Mekka (Saudi-Arabien) sowie der Camino de Santiago (Spanien). Mit diesen Vergleichen lohnt sich ein erweiterter Blick auf die Kreideebenen um Stonehenge als rein archäologisches Zeugnis (von Reisen) im Süden Englands. Die großen Steinmonumente des 3. Und 2. Jhs. v. Chr. haben nicht isoliert bestanden, sondern waren Teil einer ausgedehnten, längerfristig genutzten zeremoniellen Landschaft, an der sich zahlreiche Straßen und Wege für materiellen sowie personellen Austausch / Kulturtransfer trafen. Zwei Kernpunkte bezüglich der Routen nach Stonehenge werden hier untersucht, zum einen die Herkunft und Verbreitung der Gesteinsarten, die zur Konstruktion von Stonehenge genutzt wurden: die Sarsen-Steine der südenglische Tiefebene (Downs) aus Wessex und die sogenannten Blausteine aus dem südwestlichen Wales. Zum anderen wird der Ort daraufhin untersucht, wie der Ort auf jene Personen wirkte, die diesen besuchten und woher sie stammten
    • …
    corecore